Everybody loves Tom Hanks. I’m sure he is not a perfect person, but I don’t know where you’d find fault in him. Greater people than me have tried, and they’ve ended up sobbing to him about their troubles while he comforts them. He’s just the kind of man that exudes greatness and magnanimity, who makes you feel better about yourself.
A feature like Career Best isn’t necessarily supposed to be about who an artist is as a person but in how they’ve shown themselves to us through their work. The problem with drawing that distinction with Tom Hanks is that the goodness he conveys off-camera and the goodness he conveys on-camera feel one and the same. He’s a beloved and successful actor, but a lot of that is because what we see on the screen seems to be confirmed in real life. And when Hanks plays against type, it doesn’t always work as well, because our idea of him has been so solidified over time.
Like any human being, of course, Tom Hanks can’t be summed up as just one thing. If an actor has a long career, you can see how he has changed and grown over time. We think of Hanks now as America’s dad, but he got his start as a dry comedy actor, the star of a middling sitcom about cross-dressing roommates, Bosom Buddies. Not exactly the kind of young actor you’d expect to one day portray Fred Rogers in a biopic.
The best way to appreciate how he’s matured is chronologically. I’ve ranked his movies, of course, but first we’re going to split his career up into four different periods and dissect the movies he made in each one to get a fuller picture of who Tom Hanks the actor is. Then below that, I’ve split his movies up into tiers based on the quality of his performance and not necessarily the movie’s, with more specific commentary about Hanks’s truly transcendent performances.
We start with his burgeoning stardom in the 1980s.
A Star Is Born
A lot of the performers we think of as iconic, modern movie stars (Julia Roberts, Denzel Washington, etc.) break out early and maintain that status through the entirety of their careers, regardless of output. Tom Hanks is no exception. The 1980s embraced Hanks as a star from the word go, casting him at the center of movies for nearly the entire decade. Though I’m sure there was some savviness on his part, it feels as though Hanks had a preternatural charm that the movies could not resist.
His first movie, He Knows You’re Alone (1980), is no great shakes; it’s a slasher movie in which he doesn’t even get slashed. Lame. But his second movie, Splash (1984), directed by Ron Howard, is a bona fide hit. It’s his first real starring role, and while it hasn’t aged well, it’s a great introduction to his movie star charm at its best.
The next few years feature the movies trying to find how best to use that charm. There are a couple of terrible comedies that Hanks can’t elevate and several middling ones that he can. The Money Pit (1986) and Dragnet (1987) are awful to sit through, and Hanks can’t save them. But he’s pleasantly passive in Stan Dragoti’s The Man with One Red Shoe (1985), elevating the movie from a forgettable comedy to something actually worth watching; every scene he’s not in, you wish he was. He also elevates Bachelor Party (1984), a comedy directed by Neal Israel that wishes it was Animal House. Hanks’s performance is frantically antic in a way we never see him act again, and it shows off his comedic chops well. In Nicholas Meyer’s Volunteers (1985), he plays a privileged jerk whose smarmy veneer is broken down as he falls in love with a self-sacrificial girl (played by Hanks’s future wife, Rita Wilson!). Their rapport is great in the movie, even if the movie’s blatant racism and poorly paced story provide the thinnest of frames for the two stars to fill.
Hollywood tried Hanks in a couple of dramas after Splash as well, though nothing that could really match the mer-movie in terms of popularity. Every Time We Say Goodbye (1986), directed by Moshe Mizrahi, isn’t great as a whole, but it’s the first time he’s asked to tackle a romantic lead in a drama, and his chemistry with co-star Cristina Marsillach gives you a sense of how well he will carry future romantic films. He features opposite comedy icon Jackie Gleason in Garry Marshall’s Nothing in Common (1986), with Gleason playing Hanks’s father in old-age decline. I wish they had been given something rip-roaring to tear through. Instead it’s a sorry weeper, though they both display great dramatic chops.
Then came Penny Marshall’s Big (1988), his first truly great role and Oscar nomination. More on Big in the rankings below.
Following Big were a couple of disasters, a couple of above-average movies, and a mediocre comedy. The one thing they have in common is that Hanks feels too big for all of them. Before Big, you could see Hanks fitting his talent into the project. After Big, the projects were too small for his stardom, no matter how game he appears on screen.
The exception to this rule was The Bonfire of the Vanities (1990), which was a big project based on a best-seller. Unfortunately, it was also a catastrophe; nothing anyone is trying works, except for Melanie Griffith. Director Brian De Palma can’t find a tone, the screenplay has no idea what story it’s telling, and everyone is miscast, including Hanks, who features as a world-class jerk, but without any of the charm that made Volunteers fun to watch. The other disaster after Big was The ‘Burbs (1989), a comedy directed by Joe Dante, who must have left all of his ideas in his other movies.
Turner & Hooch (1989) is a fine movie that has lived on as a cult favorite for some reason. Is it the dog? The dog’s pretty great. Tom Hanks is good too. They have good chemistry together. Am I supposed to care about this movie?
The nearly great post-Big movies are Punchline (1988) and Joe Versus the Volcano (1990). Both movies took me by surprise. In David Seltzer’s Punchline, Hanks plays a hotshot comic who helps a stay-at-home mom (Sally Fields) find success in a stand-up comedy competition. That concept shouldn’t work at all, but Hanks and Fields are dynamite together, and the screenplay gives them the space to develop a real friendship. Joe Versus the Volcano doesn’t quite live up to its premise, which has Hanks as Joe, whose character thinks he has a terminal disease, accepting an offer to throw himself into a volcano to fulfill a ritual for the tribe that lives there. Director John Patrick Shanley gives the proceedings a fantastical sheen, and Hanks and Meg Ryan are spectacular in their first film together. But the story builds up such anticipation for how the three of them will pull it off that the ending doesn’t quite reach the transcendence it needs.
The Sky’s the Limit
Tom Hanks walks out of the 1980s with his place among the stars solidified, but it’s funny to look back at that decade of his movies now. Our expectations for movie stars’ filmographies in retrospect are never met; there are always far more clunkers than we think, and Hanks is no different. At this point, he had only had 1 great role in 15 movies, which isn’t the batting average you expect from one of the greatest movie stars of his generation.
The 1990s blow his average sky high, and it happens almost overnight. He was a big star after Big, but nothing prepared audiences for how quickly he would become the defining movie star of the 1990s, give or take a Julia Roberts. There are 8 great roles in this decade out of 11 movies. That’s insane.
Because Hanks’s success rate is so high here, most of these movies get a more detailed review below in the rankings, but it’s worth going through the progression. By 1993 (only three years after the disaster that was The Bonfire of the Vanities), Hanks is starring in one of the biggest romantic comedies of all time, Nora Ephron’s Sleepless in Seattle (1993), in which he and his co-star Meg Ryan spend 90% of the movie apart, so it rests solely on their drawing power without each other. That same year, he wins an Oscar for portraying an AIDS patient in Jonathan Demme’s Philadelphia (1993), which seems a little on the nose now but was a pretty left-field choice for Hanks in 1993. He then carries one of the highest-grossing movies ever in Robert Zemeckis’s Forrest Gump (1994) and wins another Oscar in 1994, only the second actor to win Best Actor two years in a row (Spencer Tracy pulled off the feat for 1937’s Captains Courageous and 1938’s Boys Town).
Then Hanks stars in ensembles in Apollo 13 (1995), Toy Story (1995) & Toy Story 2 (1999), and Saving Private Ryan (1998), though it is clear that the movies hinge upon his leading performances (even in a voice-acting role like Woody), and all four become instant classics. He makes his directorial debut with That Thing You Do! (1996), which is very enjoyable and in which he plays a convincingly jaded music executive. He pulls off another Nora Ephron hit with You’ve Got Mail (1998), again with Meg Ryan.
Then Hanks leads another ensemble in Frank Darabont’s The Green Mile (1999), again serving as the fulcrum for the movie’s success. He brings an easy gravitas to the role, though it’s probably the most forgettable lead performance in this era. But then he caps off this eight-year run under Zemeckis again with Cast Away (2000), which is absolutely just him for 95% of the movie. It’s a ridiculous run of movies that maybe only a few stars in Hollywood’s history can lay claim to. I looked through a few notable filmographies and couldn’t find anything like it, even back in Hollywood’s Golden Age, when the rate of production was much higher.
The one movie that sticks out in this era is A League of Their Own (1992), and not because it’s not as good as the rest. League is actually one of the few times that playing against type works out really well for Hanks. No, it’s the exception on this list because the movie doesn’t necessarily need him; he’s not the star, and the success of the movie is built around the women in it and not Hanks. But his performance is clicking within the ensemble in a way that didn’t happen in the previous decade, so it fits better in this arc as a prelude for what’s to come.
Hoping Something Sticks
By the time Hanks does Cast Away in 2000, he’s heading into his late 40s and is starting to age out of the kind of star roles he was knocking out of the park in the 1990s. Looking at Hanks’s filmography in the 2000s is like looking at a broken stained glass window. There’s supposed to be a complete picture, but it’s all over the place.
The upside of a decade like this is that it includes a good amount of risks. Risk-taking worked out great for Hanks in the ’90s. In the ’00s, the results are a bit more scattered, and none of the highs are nearly as high.
Hanks does a fair amount of playing against type in this era, starting with playing a gangster opposite Paul Newman in Sam Mendes’s Road to Perdition (2002). He’s not asked to do too much, but his presence fits the role well. Hanks takes on a Coen brothers movie in The Ladykillers (2004), as the genteel leader of an incompetent gang of thieves. It’s probably the worst movie the Coens ever made, and Hanks’s Southern shtick does not work at all. Another risk is all the motion-capturing going on in Robert Zemeckis’s The Polar Express (2004), but the less said about the uncanny valley that is that entire movie, the better.
The last real risk of this era is Cloud Atlas (2012), the adaptation of David Mitchell’s sprawling epic novel, directed by Tom Tykwer and the Wachowskis. Hanks stars with a bunch of other actors (including Halle Berry, Hugh Grant, and Susan Sarandon), and they’re all playing multiple roles over multiple timelines, and it makes no sense whatsoever, and I’m glad it exists.
Much of the rest of this decade is Tom Hanks trying to continue to do what 1990s Tom Hanks did best: movie-star charm and romance. But the movies are changing; big directors are struggling within a studio system that is increasingly loathe to finance anything that’s not going to be a blockbuster, a problem that really comes to a head in the next decade. Movie stars are losing their place in the industry as the main thing that puts butts in seats at theaters, and the artists are struggling to catch up to the changing status quo.
Stephen Spielberg made a lot of really good movies in the 2000s, but The Terminal (2004) was not one of them. Hanks stars as Viktor Navorski as a man whose visa issues keep him stuck in an airport as he falls in love with Catherine Zeta-Jones, and nothing about it works. Hanks’s accent is distracting and muffles his charm, the two stars have no chemistry, and the plot has no direction. Hanks tries to rely on his charm again in Mike Nichols’s Charlie Wilson’s War (2007), but it works this time. The movie isn’t special, but the cast (including Julia Roberts and Philip Seymour Hoffman) are a hoot to watch.
As studios begin to turn more and more to blockbusters and franchises, Hanks, whose only franchise up to this point was the Toy Story movies, tries to get in on the action with Ron Howard’s Robert Langdon movies, The Da Vinci Code (2006) and Angels & Demons (2009). They’re fine. Tom Hanks is fine in them. Good effort, everyone.
There are a few duds near the end of this period in The Great Buck Howard (2008), Larry Crowne (2011), and Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close (2011). He’s barely in the aimless Buck Howard, though he produced it, so he doesn’t get a pass. He also produced and directed Larry Crowne, a mid-life crisis plus romance movie starring him and Julia Roberts, but while the two leads are charming, the movie is under-written. Stephen Daldry’s Extremely Loud is almost the worst movie Hanks has ever appeared in, but it was nominated for Best Picture, so what do I know?
Sadly there are only two out-and-out successes during this period, and one of them is Toy Story 3 (2010). More on that franchise below. The best live-action movie of this era for Tom Hanks is Stephen Spielberg’s Catch Me If You Can (2002), which has Hanks starring as FBI agent Carl Hanratty opposite Leonardo DiCaprio’s check forger, Frank Abagnale Jr. It’s Leo’s show though, and Hanks’s performance just barely misses out on transcendence due to a bad New England accent and the fact that he’s mostly supporting Leo’s ascendance. But he shows more range in this movie than in any other during this era, from obsession and passion to regret and compassion.
America’s Dad
There are no truly great performances for Hanks between 2001 and 2012. After Extremely Loud and Cloud Atlas, it’s easy to wonder if we’ll ever see Hanks at the top of his game again. Most movie stars don’t sustain their output into middle age let alone old age, so it wouldn’t be surprising.
But then Hanks goes on another run. It’s not quite like the run in the ’90s, but he crests another enviable wave of relevance, starting with Paul Greengrass’s Captain Phillips (2013) and John Lee Hancock’s Saving Mr. Banks (2013), both of which garner Oscar buzz for Hanks. The Academy doesn’t recognize him, but the Golden Globes do (for Captain Phillips; see below). Featuring Hanks as Walt Disney, Saving Mr. Banks isn’t anything special, but pairing it with Captain Phillips solidifies the new phase of his career: Tom Hanks as America’s dad.
This continues in Bridge of Spies (2015), a minor Spielberg spy movie that requires very little of Hanks beyond his easy gravitas. That same year, he also plays a bit part in and produces the worst movie of his career, Meg Ryan’s Ithaca (2015), though Hanks is in the movie for less than three minutes, so we can forgive him. The next year he releases a couple of other minor movies, Tom Tykwer’s A Hologram for a King (2016), which features a sneaky good performance from Hanks, and the third installment in the Ron Howard’s Robert Langdon series, Inferno (2016), which is a movie.
But that year he also releases Sully (2016), a Clint Eastwood film that continues Hanks’s run of awards-season relevance and further solidifying his elder statesman status in the minds of movie-goers. And he follows that up with The Post (2017), another Spielberg movie making use of Hanks’s charm without needing him to carry the movie; that’s Meryl Streep’s job.
After a pretty mediocre Dave Eggers adaptation from James Ponsoldt, The Circle (2017), which makes no use of Hanks’s skills whatsoever, Hanks stars in the acclaimed fourth installment of his most successful franchise, Toy Story 4 (2019), which goes on to win Best Animated Feature for that year’s Oscars. But the crowning achievement of this era so far is his supporting turn as Mr. Rogers in Marielle Heller’s A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood (2019). More on that performance below, but it’s among the best things Hanks has ever done.
Looking back, Hanks, who feels like an American institution at this point, has had an incredible career with incredible variety in his success. These four eras as starkly different, but they also feel of a piece. The Tom Hanks we know today could not exist without each individual part of his career. To fully embody the force for good that we know him as now, he had to start somewhere, rise to stardom, fall into aimlessness for a bit, and come back to the top with a newfound identity. It’s his steadiness through change that makes Hanks so indelible now. Even as everything surrounding the movies feels fragile and in flux, we can’t imagine the movies without Tom Hanks.
Below are all of his movies, ranked, with special attention paid to his best performances.
We Have a Problem
46. Matthew Macauley in Ithaca (2016)
45. Thomas Schell in Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close (2011)
44. Various roles in The Polar Express (2004)
43. Elliot in He Knows You’re Alone (1980)
42. Ray Peterson in The ‘Burbs (1989)
41. Mr. Gable in The Great Buck Howard (2009)
40. Streebek in Dragnet (1987)
39. Bailey in The Circle (2017)
38. Walter Fielding in The Money Pit (1986)
She’s a Fish
37. Robert Langdon in The Da Vinci Code (2006), Angels & Demons (2009), & Inferno (2016)
No Crying in Baseball
36. Viktor Navorski in The Terminal (2004)
35. Various roles in Cloud Atlas (2012)
34. Professor G.H. Dorr in The Ladykillers (2004)
33. Sherman McCoy in The Bonfire of the Vanities (1990)
Not a Miracle
32. Richard in The Man with One Red Shoe (1985)
31. Charlie Wilson in Charlie Wilson’s War (2007)
30. Mr. White in That Thing You Do! (1996)
29. James B. Donovan in Bridge of Spies (2015)
28. David in Every Time We Say Goodbye (1986)
27. Paul Edgecomb in The Green Mile (1999)
26. Walt Disney in Saving Mr. Banks (2013)
25. Scott Turner in Turner & Hooch (1989)
24. Michael Sullivan in Road to Perdition (2002)
23. Allen Bauer in Splash (1984)
Falling with Style
22. Ben Bradlee in The Post (2017)
21. Larry Crowne in Larry Crowne (2011)
20. Carl Hanratty in Catch Me If You Can (2002)
19. David Basner in Nothing in Common (1986)
18. Rick Gassko in Bachelor Party (1984)
17. Laurence Bourne III in Volunteers (1985)
16. Steven Gold in Punchline (1988)
15. Joe in Joe Versus the Volcano (1990)
14. Alan in A Hologram for the King (2016)
Like Magic
13. Chesley ‘Sully’ Sullenberger in Sully (2016): Before the 2010s, you would have been hard-pressed to find a role that Tom Hanks disappeared into. With the exception, perhaps, of Forrest Gump, his essential Tom-Hanks-ness was always present in his roles, bringing what makes him unique and likable to his characters like the best movie stars do. But the 2010s have found a much more understated Hanks, and Sully is probably the premium example of this. Playing the ace commercial pilot who saved a US Airways plane by landing it in the Hudson River, Hanks finds a new layer of subtlety in Sully’s stoic nature. Bits of Hanks still peek through in moments when Sully gets to be cheeky and confident, but the performance deserves a place among Hanks’s best precisely because it’s so hard to find him in it.
12. Jim Lovell in Apollo 13 (1995): I struggled with whether or not Apollo 13 belonged in the top tier, because I couldn’t really even remember his performance that well apart from the film. But rewatching Ron Howard’s great movie confirmed its place here. It’s true that none of the performances stand out away from the movie as a whole, but there’s no denying that Hanks is at his peak as a movie star in Apollo 13. Whole scenes are structured around the way Hanks looks longingly at the stars or around the way Hanks maneuvers through technical dialogue. He could read the phone book and make it sound like the next great American novel. You can’t watch Apollo 13 and not come away awed by Hanks’s ability to elevate a movie.
11. Joe Fox in You’ve Got Mail (1998): I remembered You’ve Got Mail as a mildly enjoyable and slightly caustic experience, with a winsome Meg Ryan performance and Tom Hanks as a jerk, which so rarely works. Boy, was I wrong. Rewatching You’ve Got Mail solidified the 1990s as Tom Hanks’s decade through and through. He certainly does play a jerk, but the remarkable thing about Hanks’s performance as chain-bookstore owner Joe Fox is his capacity for change being apparent in the beginning and how he fills that capacity in the course of the movie. A lot of the credit should go to director and writer Nora Ephron for being brilliant at screenwriting, but Hanks’s journey from insensitivity to sensitivity is extraordinary.
10. Captain Miller in Saving Private Ryan (1998): Though technically the star of the movie, Tom Hanks is not exactly what you come out of the movie thinking about. Saving Private Ryan is best known for its opening D-Day sequence, which is admittedly brilliant. Some have gone so far as to claim the movie is rated higher than it should be as a result of that scene’s power. But to overlook the rest of the movie is to miss one of Hanks’s most powerful performances. As an officer in the Army Rangers, Hanks finds an almost serene emotional zone in which he maintains his composure externally while combusting internally. You never quite see the internal become the external, when any other actor would have shown you the seams, and that’s the mark of a great performance.
9. Woody in Toy Story (1995), Toy Story 2 (1999), Toy Story 3 (2010), & Toy Story 4 (2019): I’m sure someone will scoff at my inclusion of animated performances on this list at all. That’s fine; it’s my list, and this is still a performance. Also, a career summary for Tom Hanks would have a huge hole in it if I left out Woody. If I were ranking these performances by how iconic they are, it would be in the top five almost by default. But even beyond Woody’s icon status, Hanks’s vocal performance in these films deserves its place here, especially in the first movie. So many of Hanks’s line readings are burned into my brain forever with the delight I took in them as a child and as an adult: “You are a CHILD’S PLAY-THING!” “We see ev-ry-thing…” “That wasn’t flying! That was falling with style!” Imagining anyone else as Woody is impossible.
8. Captain Richard Phillips in Captain Phillips (2013): This role was the beginning to Tom Hanks’s return to form. At this point it was easy to see his stardom as a thing of the past. Taking this lead role in one of Paul Greengrass’s ultra-realistic thrillers did not appear to be the way back to relevance for him either; performances in Greengrass movies are not flashy and are generally subservient to the movie’s overall shaky-cam style. And for much of the movie, Hanks generally submits to the movie’s suspense and action needs, playing Captain Phillips as a man good at his job and little more. But the end of the movie, when Phillips finally succumbs to his trauma, is some of the finest acting Hanks has ever put on screen. As Phillips is being cared for by the rescue team, he comes out of shock and begins to break down, sobbing and unable to answer questions. The enormity of the entire performance is contained in that one scene; Hanks plays cool, calm, and collected for much of the movie, and then reveals to you that it was a facade. This doesn’t make Phillips weak; rather, Hanks shows you his strength.
7. Jimmy Dugan in A League of Their Own (1992): Tom Hanks in the ’90s was a different actor than he was in the ’80s; his stardom demanded a different use of his presence. In the ’80s he was drier and leaned more comedic, less warm than hot-tempered. His supporting role as the coach of a team in the 1940s-era All-American Girls Professional Baseball League is his ’80s persona turned up to eleven. Dugan is a jerk, selfish and crude, with little respect for his team of women. But A League of Their Own also features the warmth that he would become known for in the ’90s as he grows to care for his team and to see their success as his own. That Hanks is able to play that transition smoothly without being cartoonish on either side is a testament to his acting skill beyond just being a movie star.
6. Forrest Gump in Forrest Gump (1994): Forrest Gump absolutely should not work. There are plenty of people who think it doesn’t work, but the great thing about Forrest Gump is that in all the ways it comes so close to failing, it still works. The plot meanders from one episode to another, but by the time you arrive in the final stretch, every barely connected episode of Forrest’s life put together has built the movie into a meaningful panacea for the kind ennui that builds up over a lifetime. The story sometimes bogs down in the service of the movie’s special effects, especially in the black-and-white archival footage that was so celebrated at the time, but it also breathes enough for some of the best character-building moments you’ll see in a Hollywood studio film. And Hanks, who wisely plays Forrest as non-specifically slow rather than imitating a disability, binds up most of his trademark charm in a risky performance that could have alienated the audience with its opacity. Instead, you can see Hanks discovering that, as he put it years later, “my job is to behave, not to sell.”
5. Andrew Beckett in Philadelphia (1993): It seems tame today to call Tom Hanks brave for taking the role of a gay man with AIDS. But actors are still being told today to avoid LGBTQ roles so that they are not pigeonholed. Playing Andrew Beckett was a risk for Hanks; he was a star at the time, but he was not the invincible Tom Hanks we know now. Of course, he was rewarded for that risk with his first Oscar, but if Philadelphia started a trend of fetishizing LGBTQ roles for awards’ sake, it’s hard to place the blame for that on Hanks himself; Hanks has advocated for same-sex marriage and campaigned against California’s Proposition 8 in 2008. The performance itself is Oscar-worthy, a relinquishment of his star power in service of the portrayal of a kind of suffering that had barely been highlighted by Hollywood before then. The performance doesn’t need points for difficulty; if you want proof that Hanks can do more than showcase his natural charm, Philadelphia is it.
4. Fred Rogers in A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood (2019): This is a supporting role, as evidenced by the Supporting tag on his Oscar nomination, but this is Hanks’s film. As Mr. Rogers, you might think that all-around-good-guy Tom Hanks is just playing a version of himself here, but it’s actually quite a transformation, a slowing of his voice and manner that gives him a serene power over everyone in the film in stark contrast to Hanks’s affability. The journalist, played by Matthew Rhys, can’t quite believe he’s as good as he appears. But because it’s Hanks, we can.
3. Sam Baldwin in Sleepless in Seattle (1993): This is Tom Hanks, Movie Star, fully realized. If we didn’t know before Sleepless that Hanks could carry a movie and sell a high-concept story to an audience, Sleepless proved it. Hanks plays Sam, a widower with a young son trying to cope with the loss of his wife, whom he loved with a love that he calls magical. Sleepless is ostensibly a romantic comedy, but it keeps Sam’s would-be romantic partner (Meg Ryan’s Annie) apart from him for almost the entire movie, so much of the film is Sam on his own, giving monologues to a radio show or to his friends. Hanks sells the pain, loss, and longing in these scenes like no other star at the time could. We are falling in love with him just like Annie. Hanks is a wizard, because the rest of the movie should be absurd and isn’t.
2. Josh in Big (1988): Speaking of absurd movies, there is quite a bit about Big that does not work today, if it even did in 1988. Hanks plays 12-year-old Josh, magically grown into a 30-year-old. The premise is under-written, but Hanks is given the space to shine as he navigates his bigger body and the adult expectations placed upon him. His childlike wonder for the world around him changes the people he comes into contact with, including the man who becomes his boss (Robert Loggia, seen above in one of the most classic movie scenes to come out of the ’80s) and a coworker (Elizabeth Perkins in an underrated performance). The romantic stuff doesn’t work, because the screenplay can’t overcome the uncomfortable idea of a 12-year-old boy in a man’s body having sex. But the tightrope Hanks walks is thin enough that when he reaches the other side, nothing wrong with the movie matters. All you remember is Hanks.
1. Chuck Noland in Cast Away (2000): Hanks had nothing left to prove at this point in his career. He had won two Oscars in a row, joining Spencer Tracy, Katharine Hepburn, and Luise Rainer as the only actors to ever pull that feat off for leading roles. He had been the biggest movie star of the decade. He had even directed a movie and had begun executive producing. Hanks was accomplished and beloved, lacking nothing. Yet he chose to star in a movie that would be become synonymous with the idea of a one-performer movie.
It’s almost silly how over-the-top the concept of Cast Away is for its lead role. Hanks lost weight for the second half of the movie (an Oscar bait trope), and the movie is largely him dominating the screen and story. It was the second movie Hanks made with Robert Zemeckis, and it was a clear change of pace for the director once known as Hollywood’s special effects wizard, having scored big in the ’80s with Back to the Future and Who Framed Roger Rabbit, as well as with the innovations in Forrest Gump. After the thrilling plane crash sequence, Cast Away is pretty bare-bones for Zemeckis, and the movie rests ridiculously on Hanks’s shoulders.
But Hanks, the everyman archetype personified, always watchable and easy to like, is perfect for this movie. He and Zemeckis are working in perfect concert with one another. The director doesn’t waste any shots and tells the story mostly with the camera. Hanks doesn’t waste any of the good will the audience brings to the movie; he isn’t hammy, and he doesn’t overwork the time he’s given.
But there are choices that should have sunk Zemeckis and his movie, like the inclusion of Wilson, which gives Hanks some faux-dialogue that reads as hackneyed exposition on the page, and the monologue in the penultimate scene, which is a classic example of telling when showing would work just fine. But Hanks saves both of these choices from dragging the movie down. His relationship with Wilson feels like the real efforts of an unhinged man to hang on to reality. And the monologue is moving instead of cheesy, because Hanks ties the content so closely to the experiences we’ve just watched his character go through.
The degree of difficulty is a big factor for why this is Hanks’s best performance. We knew a lot about Tom Hanks when Cast Away came out, but we didn’t know he could do this. Few actors have the opportunity to single-handedly create the greatness of a movie; none have pulled it off this successfully. This makes Cast Away a singular achievement in the history of movies, as well as the greatest performance of Hanks’s great career.